News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Bats must go 

Bats must go

09 Nov, 2007 03:08 PM
SINGLETON Council has declared war on the bat population in Burdekin Park, and this time they are ready to start shooting.

After exhausting all options to rid Singleton’s picturesque Burdekin Park of its grey headed flying fox colony the fight is getting serious with councillors voting at Monday night’s meeting to apply for permission to cull the flying foxes.

Singleton Council’s parks and facilities manager Alan Fletcher said he realised it was an extreme action to take but it had a high chance of success and would eliminate the likelihood of the bats moving to another location in Singleton.

“We’ve tried everything and although these ideas are extreme it really is the end of the line,” he said.

He said the bats were damaging trees in the park some thought to be more 120 years old and this was impacting on the heritage value of the park.

He said the only other option left was to remove all the trees from the park and this would be unlikely to be approved under Singleton’s Local Environment Plan 1996 and would also result in loss of shade.

Mr Fletcher said earlier this month Singleton Council were issued with approval to use ‘birdfrite’ cartridges, a sound deterrent system, a fire hose and the chemical D-Ter from Department of Environment and Climate Change, but there were so many conditions attached it proved cost prohibitive and with no guarantees.

It was estimated to cost Singleton Council around $100,000 annually to implement the procedures.

Local bat activist Les Shilton who has been involved in ridding Burdekin Park of its flying fox colony since 2004 (the man responsible for the modified lawn mowers operation)said they were destroying the park and many trees had died as a result of bat activity.

He said the health risk associated with the grey-headed flying foxes was being overlooked and it was not simply the lyssa virus but now the deadly hendra virus that posed a very real and deadly health threat.

He said after his week long stint with the modified mowers back in 2005 he has not felt the same since.

“They pee all day and that is falling on people and going into the air,” he said.

“The irony is they are killing the park and when the trees go, the bats will go too,” he said.

Numerous community groups who previously held their events in the local park have moved to other locations, no longer prepared to take their chances with the bat faeces and urine falling from above.

The Singleton Council will now seek permission from the Department of Environment and Climate Change under the NSW Threatened Species Act 1995 and the Federal Environmental Protection and Bio-Diversity Conservation Act 1999 to cull the flying foxes and they also will be seeking permission from the NSW Fire Arms Registry to discharge a firearm in Burdekin Park.

Meanwhile Les and Joyce Shilton have scheduled a meeting at Club Singleton on November 14 at 7pm to gauge community reaction to the bats.

“This is a chance to send a clear message to the government that something has to be done,” Mr Shilton said.

“I believe the only thing that will have an impact is if the bats are harmed.

“As long as they feel safe they won’t be going anywhere and we might as well say goodbye to Burdekin Park,” he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Firstly I suggest you find out how this deadly hendra virus is transmitted to people rather then just try and make excuses.

Secondly where were the bats located before moving in to occupy Burdekin Park if they were not already there. Could it be that the reason they have taken up residence in this park is because the council or some other authority has removed their original habitat? How about people start taking responsibility for their actions and start finding a suitable location for the animals to be relocated to!

Is the council also suggesting that they would like to shoot an animal that is listed as vulnerable in the conservation listings. Good one folks you definitely would win my vote. Not

Posted by Sean, 11/11/2007 4:29:08 AM
No Bats, no forests
Posted by Gloria Litchfield, 11/11/2007 4:35:39 AM
please as a bat carer i plead with you all there must be another way dont cull them they have babies and are loveing careing mothers,we dont go to your homes and cull you because there is not enough water think about this you will kill our forest if you kill our flying foxes..............
Posted by rell0570, 11/11/2007 5:54:47 AM
These bats are verging on being an endangered species,so of course humans, who should be in the roll of protectors of other species,will do everything they can to push them to extinction.You are concerned about losing the trees, but if we continue to wipe out bat habitats,therefore wiping out bats,we will very soon be seeing a loss of forest so significant that we will be having concerns for our own mortality.Without flying foxes,there will be no regeneration of forest trees, and our motto will become - no bats, no trees- no trees , no me!! It is about time that we took our roll as the dominant species seriously, and started to ensure that all other species that we are co-dependant upon, will survive for our future,instead of just worrying about the little picture, and spoiling a few weekend days in the park.Also,on the subject of viruses carried by flying foxes,yes, there is a risk to humans,but you need to be bitten or very deeply scratched to be infected, and such a small percentage of bats actually carry these viruses ,and the only way to be bitten is to pick them up , and surely there have been enough scare tactics in the media,that everyone should be aware of this.Oh,and despite recent events on halloween night,bats do not attack people.There would have been a logical explanation for what happened!So please think about the big picture, and be careful how you destroy whats left of our planet's future.
Posted by Batty 2007, 11/11/2007 6:14:49 AM
Lyssa virus is transferred via saliva when someone is bitten or scratched, not via exposure to urine or faeces.

An understanding of bats and their role in ecology as well as a long term strategy for living with these animals would be of more benefit than killing them.


Posted by Alison, 11/11/2007 6:27:45 AM
I was shocked to hear tht you may begin shooting flying foxes in your area. Please, please, please consult with (Bat Care Brisbane Inc (ph: 07 33211229) and other care organisations for a better solution. We need bats for the long term health of our environment!!!
Posted by Nanette - Brisbane, 12/11/2007 2:07:56 PM
Humans should be ashamed of themselves. These highly intelligent creatures are starving from the drought and have enough pressures from development destroying their habitat without "bat-haters' getting on board. These poor animals have had some bad press by ignorant minded people, when in actual truth they are only a minor health threat with only 1 death caused by lyssa virus. These creatures are a vulnerable species and it is their faeces that spreads the seeds to build forests. Instead why not encourge them to move on by planting a flying fox food forest planted strategically to allow the bats to feed and roost away from ignorant humans. Costs would be minimal and all work could be carried out by bushcare volunteers who do appreciate these wonderous little creatures
Posted by save the bats, 12/11/2007 7:59:54 PM
Research shows that culling bats does not reduce the size of a camp as they are members of a colony which occurs across three states. Removing some adults through culling will simply create a vaccuum for other individuals to fill, having been provided with space to roost and reduced competition for mates and food.

The work done in the Royal Botanical Gardens of Melbourne shows that a camp may be successfully relocated by using noise and light as deterrents, whereas shooting had no impact on camp size. The Melbourne RBG colony is now settled at a new location where they are becoming a tourist attraction.

While it is unlikely that the NSW State government will approve the use of lethal force, words being used by people like Les Shilton will only serve to scare people into thinking there is a chance they will be infected by a virus. The only people to become infected by lyssa virus have been a few authorised bat handlers, and those contracting hendra virus did so through contact not with bats but with horses. There is NO danger to the community.

The only danger is that by killing the bats, this endangered species will become less viable and as they pollinate native tree species they are vital maintaining overall forest health. If non lethal methods were effectively applied sooner there wouldn't be a problem.

Posted by grey, 12/11/2007 10:27:25 PM
It is good that the local community groups have other locations to have their picnics and recreation.

For the bats it's a matter of life and death. They are losing their home and their lives.

Have a heart and share your territory.

Posted by Jane, 12/11/2007 11:15:36 PM
The article 'Bats must go' (9/11/07) is short-sighted and parochial. Grey-headed Flying Foxes numbers are in severe decline throughout their range due to loss of habitat. They are now scheduled as Threatened in NSW legislation. The trees in Burdekin Park may be 120 years old, while the flying foxes are nearing the end of tens of thousands of years of evolution - heading for extinction by the actions of people.

The only person to die from a disease carried by Flying foxes was bitten when handling a sick bat. This is the only way to catch something from a bat. So leave them alone and remain safe.

Finally, the timber industry is dependent on flying foxes which do most of the pollination of the trees in our forests. Without bats, there will be fewer seedlings to replace those trees harvested by the industry.

Posted by Hugh, 12/11/2007 11:50:38 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

1) Apple iPhone 4 32GB43 plans 1%
2) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 7%
3) HTC Desire4 plans 3%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 1%
5) Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro37 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press

Domain - Find an agent


Singleton Argus







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...