News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Doyles Creek proposal - truth be told 

Doyles Creek proposal - truth be told

10 Jan, 2012 09:13 AM
THE company director of a Singleton shire coalmine development has altered his stance on the project.

In an interview with The Argus after a war of words erupted over the Doyles Creek proposal NuCoal’s Glen Lewis said company officials picked the initial exploration drilling sites on the Apple Tree Flat farm of Ian and Robyn Moore, not the Moores.

Mr Lewis also said homes and dams above the proposed underground pit would be considered in the mine plan.

Mr Moore, who is legally blind, made national media headlines last month during a Land and Environment Court case aimed to stop NuCoal from drilling on his farm.

The judge granted the company an access arrangement then Resources Minister Chris Hartcher called on NuCoal officials to voluntarily suspend exploration on its 28 square kilometre licence area at Jerrys Plains until an Independent Commission Against Corruption inquiry was completed into the way the licence was granted.

NuCoal officials struck a compromise, saying that while there would be no coal exploration on the Moore’s 180 hectares the company would continue drilling on land the company owned or held an access agreement over.

This led to more national media coverage and letters to various newspapers plus a public letter to residents of Jerrys Plains and Apple Tree Flat from consultative committee member Steve Evans and a public letter from NuCoal officials Ken Barry and Gary Cambourn.

Mr Evans said he was concerned that Mr Lewis said in a newspaper letter that Ian Moore chose the original location for drilling in his property, that company officials told the Doyles Creek consultative committee that homes and dams would not be considered in the mine plan and that the committee’s minutes were, at times, inaccurate.

“I’m not anti-mining, I’ve worked in the industry all my life, but I became infuriated by the information that was coming out,” Mr Evans said.

“I’m concerned about the impact of mining such a rich agricultural area and what it could do to underground water and the thriving rural community and I want to ensure balanced and accurate information is made public.”

Mr Lewis told The Argus that in a letter he had published last month in The Land about the original coal exploration drill holes, he actually meant to refer to the location of drilling which was decided upon after months of arbitration negotiations before the start of the Land and Environment Court.

Mr Lewis also said the Mining Act required homes and dams on private property above underground mines to be considered in mine plans and it was wrong for anyone to say otherwise.

He said the Doyles Creek mine consultative committee was chaired by a person independent to the mine and the minutes were finalised by an independent person after each consultative committee member had an opportunity to comment on a draft.

Mr Lewis said his company had drilled 42 coal exploration holes in the past two years and he expected an environmental statement for the mine to be completed soon and handed to state government officials in about a month.

The director general’s requirements for the proposal should be available in about six months and Mr Lewis expected to lodge a formal development application for the Doyles Creek pit with the state government by about the end of this year.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
There needs to be an urgent review of these Community Insult Committees. Far too often they are not representative of communities at all, but rather selectively stacked with strategic partners often in receipt of sponsorship from the company. There is no protection for decent Community members who challenge the status quo. The CCCs runs on pitiful "guidelines" (interpretation open to Chair.) Guidelines are rarely enforced as intended. Minutes are often misleading & difficult to correct. I challenge anyone to locate a publicly available CCC Chairs annual report to the Director General. Anyone?
Posted by Ali, 10/01/2012 11:49:23 AM, on Singleton Argus
This starts and ends with caring government. We have one the doesn't really care.

Miners too have a role - they CAN choose to act on moral grounds and leave communities to enjoy their peace.

The profits are not Australian.

Without coal, business and investment would develop other industry and employment - with far better outcomes - for Australia.

Posted by minedoubt, 11/01/2012 9:19:46 AM, on Singleton Argus
The whole area from Jerrys Plains along the southern side of the Hunter is the last bastion of clean farm country in the Mbk shire. Doyles Creek though it is in Sgltn Shire was the last ditched effort to industrialise this pristine area along with the Spir Hill & Fernadale by the dying Labour Gov. These leases are intended to overwhelm the locals and create more coal royalty revinue for the state. These irresponsible leases will be fought and opposed with equal determination as those coal speculators hoping to get rich by trashing this area. This area should not be another moonscape.
Posted by Liesandmorelies, 12/01/2012 11:34:28 PM, on Singleton Argus

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
CONCERNED: Doyles Creek resident Steve Evans wants balanced and accurate information about NuCoal’s proposed underground coalmine to be made public.
CONCERNED: Doyles Creek resident Steve Evans wants balanced and accurate information about NuCoal’s proposed underground coalmine to be made public.

Most popular articles




Singleton Argus







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...